![]() |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
"PeteS" wrote in message
... Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml The author is clearly not very technically savvy. He says: "Microsoft will get your "Internet protocol address, the type of operating system, browser and name and version of the software you are using, and the language code of the device where you installed the software." Wow! If only he realized every single web site he's ever visited gets that same information, I bet he'd *really* be up in arms! |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, the renowned PeteS
wrote: Found this in my aimless surfing. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS It doesn't mention the indexing program (which goes through your entire HDD). It attempts to contact Microsoft for who knows what purpose.. And they've screwed around with Explorer search so you practically need to use it. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:15:50 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, the renowned PeteS wrote: Found this in my aimless surfing. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS It doesn't mention the indexing program (which goes through your entire HDD). It attempts to contact Microsoft for who knows what purpose.. And they've screwed around with Explorer search so you practically need to use it. I have two applications that haven't been ported to Linux, so I still have a Windows XP partition on one of my boxes. Before booting into it, I disable the wifi tranceiver. Anthing I need to download for use in Windows gets downloaded with Linux. It's bad enough that you can't buy a new (non-Apple) personal computer without Vista, but I can't believe that people are actually paying to install this bloated pile of spyware and DRM. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
Stephen J. Rush wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:15:50 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, the renowned PeteS wrote: Found this in my aimless surfing. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS It doesn't mention the indexing program (which goes through your entire HDD). It attempts to contact Microsoft for who knows what purpose.. And they've screwed around with Explorer search so you practically need to use it. I have two applications that haven't been ported to Linux, so I still have a Windows XP partition on one of my boxes. Before booting into it, I disable the wifi tranceiver. Anthing I need to download for use in Windows gets downloaded with Linux. It's bad enough that you can't buy a new (non-Apple) personal computer without Vista, but I can't believe that people are actually paying to install this bloated pile of spyware and DRM. System76. Nice people, their systems come loaded with Ubuntu, their support staff (all one of him, as far as I can tell) are (is?) responsive, and everything works. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Do you need to implement control loops in software? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, PeteS wrote:
Found this in my aimless surfing. Yes... it was aimless. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague Idiot. I remember dopes like you after Windows 95 came out, yet '95 was the worst, most vulnerable Windows release made. Think you'll come around by 2012? |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
Found this in my aimless surfing.
Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:15:50 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, the renowned PeteS wrote: Found this in my aimless surfing. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS It doesn't mention the indexing program (which goes through your entire HDD). It attempts to contact Microsoft for who knows what purpose.. And they've screwed around with Explorer search so you practically need to use it. All indexing functions are very easy to turn off, and mine didn't try to contact Microsoft. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, PeteS wrote:
Found this Set your PC's clock right. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
Stephen J. Rush wrote:
I have two applications that haven't been ported to Linux, so I still have a Windows XP partition on one of my boxes. Before booting into it, I disable the wifi tranceiver. Anthing I need to download for use in Windows gets downloaded with Linux. It's bad enough that you can't buy a new (non-Apple) personal computer without Vista, Dell will sell you a PC with any flavor of linux you want on it. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:01:26 -0700, the renowned Spurious Response
wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:15:50 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, the renowned PeteS wrote: Found this in my aimless surfing. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS It doesn't mention the indexing program (which goes through your entire HDD). It attempts to contact Microsoft for who knows what purpose.. And they've screwed around with Explorer search so you practically need to use it. All indexing functions are very easy to turn off, and mine didn't try to contact Microsoft. How do you know it didn't? Their "firewall" does not stop any outgoing communications, by default, and they make it very difficult to set up otherwise. And since they crippled the search function in Explorer... Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:12:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
wrote: Hank you for posting this interesting and informative article, Please ignore the mentally diseased k00k calling itself "spurious response ". You leave his Hank alone, kook. It is a chronic net abuser. His Hank isn't, but you are. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:50:14 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:01:26 -0700, the renowned Spurious Response wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:15:50 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, the renowned PeteS wrote: Found this in my aimless surfing. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS It doesn't mention the indexing program (which goes through your entire HDD). It attempts to contact Microsoft for who knows what purpose.. And they've screwed around with Explorer search so you practically need to use it. All indexing functions are very easy to turn off, and mine didn't try to contact Microsoft. How do you know it didn't? I am aware of these things. Their "firewall" does not stop any outgoing communications, by default, I do not use "their firewall"... at all... and they make it very difficult to set up otherwise. Bull****. Every decent router has a hardware firewall, that comes AFTER windows, but BEFORE the cable modem, and Windows doesn't nor can it do anything about downstream controls. In fact, it is my DHCP server in some instances. And since they crippled the search function in Explorer... I do not use exploder. I use Mozilla and google, etc. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany |
Prongboi kook still fouling electronics groups. That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:35:33 -0700, Samantha Pierce-Harder
wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:09:28 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:03:32 -0700, Spurious Response wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, PeteS wrote: Found this Set your PC's clock right. Still the trolling k00k eh prongboi? Quit fouling interesting threads with your egomania. Seek help ASAP. You're left alone for five minutes and here you are abusing posters and trying to disrupt on topic threads with your nonsense and chronic net abuse. interesting article on Microsoft spyware snipped by k00k restored. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forget-about-the-WGA-20-Windows-Vista-Features-and-Services-Harvest-User-Data-for-Microsoft-58752.shtml He is a weird one right enough Pierce Harder, Samantha... HARDER! |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:52:18 -0700, the renowned Spurious Response
wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:50:14 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:01:26 -0700, the renowned Spurious Response wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:15:50 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:00:28 -0400, the renowned PeteS wrote: Found this in my aimless surfing. Amusing, and yet another reason to avoid Vista like the plague http://news.softpedia.com/news/Forge...ft-58752.shtml Cheers PeteS It doesn't mention the indexing program (which goes through your entire HDD). It attempts to contact Microsoft for who knows what purpose.. And they've screwed around with Explorer search so you practically need to use it. All indexing functions are very easy to turn off, and mine didn't try to contact Microsoft. How do you know it didn't? I am aware of these things. Their "firewall" does not stop any outgoing communications, by default, I do not use "their firewall"... at all... and they make it very difficult to set up otherwise. Bull****. Every decent router has a hardware firewall, that comes AFTER windows, but BEFORE the cable modem, and Windows doesn't nor can it do anything about downstream controls. In fact, it is my DHCP server in some instances. A router firewall can't tell you which programs are doing what. That's why most of us use both. And since they crippled the search function in Explorer... I do not use exploder. I use Mozilla and google, etc. Explorer, not IE. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
Prongboi kook still fouling electronics groups. That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:01:15 -0700, Samantha Pierce-Harder
wrote: Pierce Harder, Samantha... HARDER! Pleading for a virtual leucotomy now? Jeez. **** off... now. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:10:57 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
wrote: some instances. A router firewall can't tell you which programs are doing what. That's why most of us use both. PS This program uses http prototcol to 131.107.115.28. (crl.microsoft.com) It isn't going to be blocked by a typical hardware firewall, because the firewall doesn't know the difference between that and a user surfing on Firefox to some random website. And since they crippled the search function in Explorer... I do not use exploder. I use Mozilla and google, etc. Explorer, not IE. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:37:07 -0400, SP
wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:10:57 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: some instances. A router firewall can't tell you which programs are doing what. That's why most of us use both. PS This program uses http prototcol to 131.107.115.28. (crl.microsoft.com) It isn't going to be blocked by a typical hardware firewall, because the firewall doesn't know the difference between that and a user surfing on Firefox to some random website. And since they crippled the search function in Explorer... I do not use exploder. I use Mozilla and google, etc. Explorer, not IE. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany And I suppose you can't kill that using the "hosts" file? ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | | | E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat | | http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:37:07 -0400, SP
wrote: PS This program uses http prototcol to 131.107.115.28. (crl.microsoft.com) It isn't going to be blocked by a typical hardware firewall, because the firewall doesn't know the difference between that and a user surfing on Firefox to some random website. Bull****. Firewalls can be programmed to block entire domains, in or out, or both. Not sure you have seen many "typical hardware firewalls". If you have it must only be cursory glances. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:12:37 -0700, the renowned Jim Thompson
wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:37:07 -0400, SP wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:10:57 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: some instances. A router firewall can't tell you which programs are doing what. That's why most of us use both. PS This program uses http prototcol to 131.107.115.28. (crl.microsoft.com) It isn't going to be blocked by a typical hardware firewall, because the firewall doesn't know the difference between that and a user surfing on Firefox to some random website. And since they crippled the search function in Explorer... I do not use exploder. I use Mozilla and google, etc. Explorer, not IE. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany And I suppose you can't kill that using the "hosts" file? ...Jim Thompson Maybe it has Micros**t's IP address hard coded in it. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany -- "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:12:37 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:37:07 -0400, SP wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:10:57 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote: some instances. A router firewall can't tell you which programs are doing what. That's why most of us use both. PS This program uses http prototcol to 131.107.115.28. (crl.microsoft.com) It isn't going to be blocked by a typical hardware firewall, because the firewall doesn't know the difference between that and a user surfing on Firefox to some random website. And since they crippled the search function in Explorer... I do not use exploder. I use Mozilla and google, etc. Explorer, not IE. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany And I suppose you can't kill that using the "hosts" file? Ha ha ha, you a funny guy Jim. Think this, "hosts" file is like a local DNS server. ...Jim Thompson |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:20:01 -0700, Spurious Response
wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:37:07 -0400, SP wrote: PS This program uses http prototcol to 131.107.115.28. (crl.microsoft.com) It isn't going to be blocked by a typical hardware firewall, because the firewall doesn't know the difference between that and a user surfing on Firefox to some random website. Bull****. Firewalls can be programmed to block entire domains, in or out, or both. "Can be" but was *yours* programmed to block that particular domain or IP address? Not sure you have seen many "typical hardware firewalls". If you have it must only be cursory glances. It's in another room, so I seldom give it even a sideways glance. It's administered over the network. |
That nice MS corp - so caring about your data
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:27:47 -0400, SP
wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:20:01 -0700, Spurious Response wrote: On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:37:07 -0400, SP wrote: PS This program uses http prototcol to 131.107.115.28. (crl.microsoft.com) It isn't going to be blocked by a typical hardware firewall, because the firewall doesn't know the difference between that and a user surfing on Firefox to some random website. Bull****. Firewalls can be programmed to block entire domains, in or out, or both. "Can be" but was *yours* programmed to block that particular domain or IP address? Has been, for years, on certain machines. Not sure you have seen many "typical hardware firewalls". If you have it must only be cursory glances. It's in another room, so I seldom give it even a sideways glance. It's administered over the network. No ****. That took a lot of brains. You wouldn't be inside the case flipping dip switches. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter