--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:33:17 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


I wonder if ASUS knows that you are posting their copyrighted materials
into Usenet.

That is aside from how totally retarded posting such a thing is, when
it can be easily viewed at their page.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...&mod elmenu=1

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:33:17 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

I wonder if ASUS knows that you are posting their copyrighted materials
into Usenet.

That is aside from how totally retarded posting such a thing is, when
it can be easily viewed at their page.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...&mod elmenu=1


Gee, dip****. It was posted with their notice still in place. I
didn't alter it, or claim ownership. I simply posted it to show everyone
how stupid you are, without putting the load on their servers.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:40 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:33:17 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

I wonder if ASUS knows that you are posting their copyrighted materials
into Usenet.

That is aside from how totally retarded posting such a thing is, when
it can be easily viewed at their page.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...&mod elmenu=1


Gee, dip****. It was posted with their notice still in place. I
didn't alter it, or claim ownership. I simply posted it to show everyone
how stupid you are, without putting the load on their servers.

You are a load, dip****. A load of ****.

Just because you don't alter a copyrighted work or retain the notice of
the owner, doesn't make it OKie dokie to use it as you please.

You could be a bit more clueless, but not in this life.

The link would NOT "load their servers", idiot. They welcome such
visits. It would, in fact, give persons reading this group a choice as
to whether they want to see you bull**** or not.

Check again, dumb****. Check my posts, which correctly remarked on how
newer motherboards, which is what the SkyTard was talking about, would be
DDR2, which is what he said, and how I told him that his current CPU was
socket 939, which it is, and how his current RAM, being NOT DDR2 would
not work in a newer MOBO.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be on the same rung as the
BrandonTard, on the great ladder of stupidity, which you and he built,
and own, all by yourselves.

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:40 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:33:17 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

I wonder if ASUS knows that you are posting their copyrighted materials
into Usenet.

That is aside from how totally retarded posting such a thing is, when
it can be easily viewed at their page.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...&mod elmenu=1


Gee, dip****. It was posted with their notice still in place. I
didn't alter it, or claim ownership. I simply posted it to show everyone
how stupid you are, without putting the load on their servers.

You are a load, dip****. A load of ****.

Just because you don't alter a copyrighted work or retain the notice of
the owner, doesn't make it OKie dokie to use it as you please.

You could be a bit more clueless, but not in this life.

The link would NOT "load their servers", idiot. They welcome such
visits. It would, in fact, give persons reading this group a choice as
to whether they want to see you bull**** or not.

Check again, dumb****. Check my posts, which correctly remarked on how
newer motherboards, which is what the SkyTard was talking about, would be
DDR2, which is what he said, and how I told him that his current CPU was
socket 939, which it is, and how his current RAM, being NOT DDR2 would
not work in a newer MOBO.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be on the same rung as the
BrandonTard, on the great ladder of stupidity, which you and he built,
and own, all by yourselves.

Yawn.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:43:34 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:40 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:33:17 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

I wonder if ASUS knows that you are posting their copyrighted materials
into Usenet.

That is aside from how totally retarded posting such a thing is, when
it can be easily viewed at their page.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...&mod elmenu=1


Gee, dip****. It was posted with their notice still in place. I
didn't alter it, or claim ownership. I simply posted it to show everyone
how stupid you are, without putting the load on their servers.

You are a load, dip****. A load of ****.

Just because you don't alter a copyrighted work or retain the notice of
the owner, doesn't make it OKie dokie to use it as you please.

You could be a bit more clueless, but not in this life.

The link would NOT "load their servers", idiot. They welcome such
visits. It would, in fact, give persons reading this group a choice as
to whether they want to see you bull**** or not.

Check again, dumb****. Check my posts, which correctly remarked on how
newer motherboards, which is what the SkyTard was talking about, would be
DDR2, which is what he said, and how I told him that his current CPU was
socket 939, which it is, and how his current RAM, being NOT DDR2 would
not work in a newer MOBO.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be on the same rung as the
BrandonTard, on the great ladder of stupidity, which you and he built,
and own, all by yourselves.

Yawn.

Hey, Michael, after they put you in prison for life, for your
aggravated copyright abuse, we'll bake you cookies.

John

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:37:23 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:43:34 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:40 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:33:17 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

I wonder if ASUS knows that you are posting their copyrighted materials
into Usenet.

That is aside from how totally retarded posting such a thing is, when
it can be easily viewed at their page.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...&mod elmenu=1


Gee, dip****. It was posted with their notice still in place. I
didn't alter it, or claim ownership. I simply posted it to show everyone
how stupid you are, without putting the load on their servers.

You are a load, dip****. A load of ****.

Just because you don't alter a copyrighted work or retain the notice of
the owner, doesn't make it OKie dokie to use it as you please.

You could be a bit more clueless, but not in this life.

The link would NOT "load their servers", idiot. They welcome such
visits. It would, in fact, give persons reading this group a choice as
to whether they want to see you bull**** or not.

Check again, dumb****. Check my posts, which correctly remarked on how
newer motherboards, which is what the SkyTard was talking about, would be
DDR2, which is what he said, and how I told him that his current CPU was
socket 939, which it is, and how his current RAM, being NOT DDR2 would
not work in a newer MOBO.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be on the same rung as the
BrandonTard, on the great ladder of stupidity, which you and he built,
and own, all by yourselves.

Yawn.

Hey, Michael, after they put you in prison for life, for your
aggravated copyright abuse, we'll bake you cookies.

John

Be sure to put lots of Lithium, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in them.
Oh, and be sure to include some fine PCBs and some Paraquat, and let's
mot forget a smattering of Agent Orange.

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:25:09 -0700, JackShephard
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 09:37:23 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:43:34 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:09:40 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

JackShephard wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 02:33:17 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

I wonder if ASUS knows that you are posting their copyrighted materials
into Usenet.

That is aside from how totally retarded posting such a thing is, when
it can be easily viewed at their page.

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...&mod elmenu=1


Gee, dip****. It was posted with their notice still in place. I
didn't alter it, or claim ownership. I simply posted it to show everyone
how stupid you are, without putting the load on their servers.

You are a load, dip****. A load of ****.

Just because you don't alter a copyrighted work or retain the notice of
the owner, doesn't make it OKie dokie to use it as you please.

You could be a bit more clueless, but not in this life.

The link would NOT "load their servers", idiot. They welcome such
visits. It would, in fact, give persons reading this group a choice as
to whether they want to see you bull**** or not.

Check again, dumb****. Check my posts, which correctly remarked on how
newer motherboards, which is what the SkyTard was talking about, would be
DDR2, which is what he said, and how I told him that his current CPU was
socket 939, which it is, and how his current RAM, being NOT DDR2 would
not work in a newer MOBO.

If you were any more clueless, you'd be on the same rung as the
BrandonTard, on the great ladder of stupidity, which you and he built,
and own, all by yourselves.

Yawn.

Hey, Michael, after they put you in prison for life, for your
aggravated copyright abuse, we'll bake you cookies.

John

Be sure to put lots of Lithium, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury in them.
Oh, and be sure to include some fine PCBs and some Paraquat, and let's
mot forget a smattering of Agent Orange.

I use so many chocolate chips and pecans, there wouldn't be room for
that stuff.

John