Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
tempus fugit wrote: Eeyore wrote : The IC mic amps that are around are internally quite like their discrete counterparts but just not quite as good and vastly more expensive. They're a boon for 'designers' who can't actually really design though. Guys like me..... lol Actually Graham that does bring up an interesting question though. The SSM2019 is only a couple bucks apiece in for 100 or more. I'm sure you must have close to that in parts in your design. Nowhere near that much. Both need the pot, so lets take that out of the equation. My discrete design needs 2 or 4 transistors ( 2 of them very low noise) and 1 or 2 halves of a dual op-amp plus a few passives. Total cost in manufacturing quantities is under 50 cents. There seems to be a preference for discrete designs - what makes them better than something like the 2019? Or are they actually better? They actually can outperform a 2019. The later version I posted with overall differential feedback most certainly so. Graham |
#122
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
Genome wrote...
Have you tried out my IGBT thing yet? Could you remind me what you're referring to? -- Thanks, - Win |
#123
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
Eeyore wrote...
is left for the preamp to use, as the 3MHz TL072 bandwidth is reduced to 300kHz. Sheesh! I know what you're saying but it works out in practice rather better than the numbers alone might suggest. I should add I'm thinking of the upper end of the spectrum where the loop gain is low, for example 5kHz where it'll be 300kHz/5kHz = 60. That can be further reduced as the opamp drives various loads. I suppose you'll say low distortion isn't so important at these frequencies. Did you measure and plot it? -- Thanks, - Win |
#124
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
Jim Thompson wrote...
Bang-for-the-buck, the composite PNP/NPN has a nice noise floor... ~1nV/rt-Hz! Now you're becoming a fan? -- Thanks, - Win |
#125
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
Winfield Hill wrote: Eeyore wrote... is left for the preamp to use, as the 3MHz TL072 bandwidth is reduced to 300kHz. Sheesh! I know what you're saying but it works out in practice rather better than the numbers alone might suggest. I should add I'm thinking of the upper end of the spectrum where the loop gain is low, for example 5kHz where it'll be 300kHz/5kHz = 60. That can be further reduced as the opamp drives various loads. In this situation the mic stage is relatively rarely driving any externals loads and those that it may do will be quite benign as a rule. I suppose you'll say low distortion isn't so important at these frequencies. Did you measure and plot it? Actually plot it ? I don't recall doing that. I tend to make 'spot measurements' and I don't recall any problems. You're seriously testing my memory now ! I certainly don't recall any alarming rise in THD. It's no worse than a normal 20dB gain stage after all. It seems that at all settings THD is dominated by the compound pair btw. Graham |
#126
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
Winfield Hill a écrit :
Jim Thompson wrote... Bang-for-the-buck, the composite PNP/NPN has a nice noise floor... ~1nV/rt-Hz! Now you're becoming a fan? A fan revolves at 3600rpm :-) -- Thanks, Fred. |
#127
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
Fred Bartoli wrote:
Winfield Hill a écrit : Jim Thompson wrote... Bang-for-the-buck, the composite PNP/NPN has a nice noise floor... ~1nV/rt-Hz! Now you're becoming a fan? A fan revolves at 3600rpm :-) None of mine do. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#128
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
"Winfield Hill" wrote in message ... Genome wrote... Have you tried out my IGBT thing yet? Could you remind me what you're referring to? -- Thanks, - Win Basic Idea http://www.genomerics.org/patent/patent.html Used in a PFC circuit http://www.genomerics.org/patent/newpfc.html Used in a Class D amplifier http://www.genomerics.org/patent/spice.rar Probably best to ignore me :-) DNA |
#129
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
A better mic preamp
On 20 Mar 2007 05:18:56 -0700, Winfield Hill
wrote: Eeyore wrote... is left for the preamp to use, as the 3MHz TL072 bandwidth is reduced to 300kHz. Sheesh! I know what you're saying but it works out in practice rather better than the numbers alone might suggest. I should add I'm thinking of the upper end of the spectrum where the loop gain is low, for example 5kHz where it'll be 300kHz/5kHz = 60. That can be further reduced as the opamp drives various loads. I suppose you'll say low distortion isn't so important at these frequencies. Did you measure and plot it? --- Of course not. He's an audio freak with a rampant ego, and he thinks that what he thinks sounds good should be good enough for everyone else. -- JF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mike Preamp (from S.E.D) - MikePreamp.pdf | Electronic Schematics | |||
Yamaha C-4 preamp schematic please | Electronics Repair | |||
Preamp problems on a guitar amp | Electronics Repair | |||
Phono Preamp | Electronics Repair | |||
Omni i/o 2 channel preamp to pc a/d | Electronics Repair |