Fletis Humplebacker wrote:
....
... I've even said what the approach
should be to be fair to science and the students. You seem to be evading
reading it. No one suggested that science stop so your assertion is
quite false.

No, you've replied in generalities about there being "obvious" design
but neglected to answer the questions of how this is to be demonstrated
(other than by faith and assertion) and how/whether this
intervention/design is/was a one-time or continuing process and also how
that can be demonstrated or reconciled w/ natural processes.