Larry Blanchard wrote:
Fletis Humplebacker wrote:

Steve Peterson wrote:


So give us your words. How about the first 20 sentences a teacher
should use to introduce the idea that evolution, or some other
scientific theory, has met an impasse, and cannot advance without
invoking an intelligent designer?



My, my, you're getting yourself all worked up. All because you
made an assertion that you can't support. I haven't suggested
that scientific investigation stop, neither do most ID proponents as
far as I can tell. That's a straw man argument if there ever was one.


You're really good at evading the question, aren't you?

We're still waiting for your answer - although without much hope of
getting one.


We've discussed a few many times now. I've even said what the approach
should be to be fair to science and the students. You seem to be evading
reading it. No one suggested that science stop so your assertion is
quite false.