"Steve Peterson"
"Fletis Humplebacker"
Fletis Humplebacker wrote:
Fletis Humplebacker wrote:
wrote:
There are infinitely many ways to invoke God.
A statement to the effect that "This step in evolution can be
explained as the result of intervention by a pre-existing
intelligence.", would be one way to invoke God in the
context of biology.
I repeat, what is the next statement? How does a teacher follow up this very cogent assertion?
Those aren't my words.
I assert that making specific statements will allow evolutionists to investigate and counter. And if this is the end of the
argument, it leaves hanging the question "what is it about this step in evolution that makes it unnatural so that only a
pre-existing (notice how this term keeps evolving) can account for it?"
Still wondering.
Steve
I'm not the one evolving the word either. Also I said many times
that ID doesn't cripple science. I believe that was your assertion.