Some Thought On Intelligent Design - WAS: OT Is George BushDrinking?
Fletis Humplebacker wrote:
Yes, I will try. And you can keep proselytizing a materialistic
answer to everything, even though there's no scientific basis
for it. ...
No. A materialistic approach to science. You have no
basis for declaring that a materialistic approach to science
implies a materialistic approach to everything.
Then you didn't understand my point. If science is misused to
teach and/or imply that there are natural answers to all of
creation it goes beyond a materiatistic approach to science,
it is proselytizing a materialistic faith. That's what's going on
in public education. That's wrong and it needs to be corrected.
|