Mike Marlow wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

You can legitimately say that. The 'Iders' do not. The
concomittant proposal for an alternative is paramount to
them. Before 'ID' it was 'creation science'. They are not
in this fight for the science.

Check out their webpages and look into what other issues
they support. Their agenda will be clear.

The Creation Science guys (ICR) do have their own agenda Fred. They are
however different from ID.


Non Sequitor. Check out the 'Discovery Institute' webpages.
Current articles, in addition to 'ID' and anti-evolution stuff
include:

Rediscovering Narnia: The Continuing Relevance of C.S. Lewis's Narnian
Chronicles

Miers: The Recusal Trap
Why the Senate should reject Harriet Miers' nomination

Have You Heard the Good News...
....about adult and umbilical cord blood stem cells? Probably not
(actually, I had)

Brace for the U.N. Tax Man



That does not make 'ID' wrong, but it puts the present
controversy in perspective. Without the Christian Coalition
and its ilk, you would never have heard of ID.


ID has been around for a lot longer than the Christian Coalition. It's been
around for a lot longer than ICR as well.

What is 'ICR'?

Whom, aside from the Christian Coalition and their ilk, is involved
in suing school boards to get 'ID' into the curriculum? WIhtout
those suits, what publicity would 'ID' be getting?

--

FF