Fletis Humplebacker writes:
No, I made my position clear, if the scientists are skeptical
of Darwinian Evolution it doesn't leave much besides ID,
since no other evolution model seems to be taken seriously.

How can ID be taken seriously when there are almost NO scientific
papers discussing it?

PubMed has 11 million papers in their database. Only 6 mention the
phrase "Intelligent Design" when I checked this morning. (25 if you
include press releases, etc.)

I don't even think there is consensus as to what it IS exactly. And to
what it is NOT.


--
Sending unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account incurs a fee of
$500 per message, and acknowledges the legality of this contract.