Tim Daneliuk wrote:
wrote:

SNEEP

... but if you do become victimized by a
.357 in the hands of a criminal robbing you, you just *might* want to
legitimate the power of government to interdict and/or remediate the
situation.

Of course. But why should I pay for it when it is someone else who
is being robbed.

More fundamentally, suppose I want to trust to my own luck, what
right does the government have to force protection on me?

--

FF