"Duane Bozarth"
Fletis Humplebacker
Duane Bozarth wrote:
...
I'm done...finis. If you care to answer the question of the role of the
ID'er in all this, fine.

Their role would be to better understand the universe and the
world we live in, just like regular folks.

I'm not talking about "they", I'm asking about the whoever/whatever is
THE I in the ID argument. What is it's role in all this? I reiterate
that if there is no intervention, then there is no need. If there is
intervention, then there is no possibility for any science to make the
understanding whether it's performed by ID adherents or not.

So, I ask again--in your view, what is the role of the I in ID after the
(we'll assume for sake of argument) initial event? IOW, is it still
making changes or did it do all the design up front or some combination
of the above?


I have my personal opinions on that but they aren't relevent
to the discussion. My point isn't that my particular beliefs be
taught as science but that science can't rule out a designer.
There is no conflict between understanding things as well
as we are able and recognizing the possibility that it isn't
all a happy accident.