Some Thought On Intelligent Design - WAS: OT Is George Bush Drinking?
Mike Marlow wrote:
"Larry Blanchard" wrote in message
...
George wrote:
Trouble is, without divine endorsement, what's "right" and ethical for
one
is not necessarily "right" or ethical for another. People who talk
about
"human rights" are no different from those who preach their morality
derived from their deities of choice.
Wrong. We are subject to the same basic ethical rule as everthing else.
If it's good for the survival of the species, it's "right." If it's
bad for the survival of the species, it's "wrong."
Of course it's not that simple. There's long-term vs short-term
survival, the importance attached to a stasble society, etc.. But the
basic rule is there.
That rule doesn't stand up to widely varying cultural values for even a
second. Gonna need to come up with a different rule.
In what way doesn't it stand up? You make a flat statement without even
a smidgin of proof or a single example.
|