Mike Marlow wrote:
wrote in message
...
...

nothing wrong with intelligent design, but it doesn't belong in
science classes. it belongs in philosophy classes or in religous
studies classes.


No more so though, than some of the stuff that's taught in science class
which isn't supportable by evidence, yet over the years has come to be
taught as "fact".



There has been lots of
postulating and side track comments, but no real contradicting evidence.

no supporting evidence, either. in fact, nothing but a lot of talk and
political string pulling to get ID stuffed into grade school
curricula. no discussion in scientific fora, no open discussion, just
attempts to stuff it into kids heads under the radar.

But - what *is* the problem with the concept of intelligent design? Science
itself does not specifically deny the possibility of inteligent design. The
sciences are filled with scientists who diligently perform their tasks,
honor the rules of science, add to the cumulative knowledge of mankind, and
yet they believe in inteligent design. The mere concept of inteligent
design seems to be a major hurdle for most of the evolution-only crowd here.
...

Science itself does not specifically deny the Immaculate Conception
either.

Do you REALLY wonder why not?

--

FF