Tim Daneliuk wrote:
wrote:

Tim Daneliuk wrote:

wrote:


Tim Daneliuk wrote:


...

That's a lovely assertion. Now justify why it's OK to raid
one man's wallet and make him pay for another man's children's
education.


Or another man's security, or another man's road, or another man's
hospitalization, or another man's airport, or another man's levee ...


Exactly


Do you have a alternative suggestion that is distinguishible
from anarchy?


Yes, in this case I do. Use the force of government exclusively as
an instrument for the preservation of individual liberty. This
boils down to the government interdicting only in matters of force,
fraud, and/or threat (since all harm to individual liberty can
be reduced to one of those cases).

That's a lovely assertion. Now justify why it's OK to raid
one man's wallet and make him pay for another man's individual
liberty. Talk about robbing Peter to pay Paul!



BTW, this has to do with GW's Drinking (or not) as GW's Drinking
(or not) has to with woodworking. Shall we call a truce and
end this misbegotten thread?

Don't like the idea of mathematics by intelligent design, eh?
I'll try to finish up this weekend.


I see some of the other wreckers are
disgruntled having never apparently learned the filter and kill
functions ....

Perhaps they prefer netiquette.

--

FF