"Larry Blanchard"
"Fletis Humplebacker" ! wrote:

All I suggest is the possibility of a designer, especially since it's so
unlikely that the universe and life jump started itself into existence.
If someone says there's a better likelyhood that there is no designer,
they do so out of faith, not science.

Once again, the only rational answer to where the universe came from is "I
don't know".


Only agnosticism is rational? Even if one sees more evidence one way or
another?


But once it did exist, evolution seems to account quite well for the
diversity of species present and extinct. Our increasing knowledge of DNA
only reinforces it.


That's an overstatment if there ever was one. Many things are not explained
by evolution by chance. You are pretending there's no controversy on things
like The Cambiran Explosion within the evolutionist's camp.If you picked a
theory that you favor the most I fail to see any consistency with your agnosticim.

So you can only be rational if you don't know about a designer but
insist on a particular evolutionary model? Hmm.

So evolution should be taught in schools - where the universe came from
should not.


Evolution by itself leaves more questions than it answers. Perhaps intellectual
curiousity will finally be purged out of public ed but I hope not.