"Duane Bozarth" wrote in message
...
Tim Daneliuk wrote:

I think your other responses however, indicate you have a pretty poor
understanding of "how science works" that leads to what is, imo, an
incorrect conclusion about that status of ID as an alternative in the
science curriculum.

As social phenomenon and philosophy it has some place, but not in
science other than an "obtw, there are those who think this is a crock
but they're misguided".

I respectfully suggest amending to "obtw, there are those who think this
crock but they're misguided."