Tim Daneliuk wrote:
...


This is an argument by misdirection at best. The only reason these are
not "scientific questions" at the moment is because of the current *philosophical*
assumptions of science.

It is basic philosphical assumptions that distinguish science from
other processes for aquiring knowledge.

The very sufficiency of "the scientific approach" is
potentially on trial ...

Mathematics is insufficient to prove or disprove all theora. Does
this suggest to you that those theora be resolved by non-Mathematical
means?

--

FF