In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
dennis@home wrote:


Shame as you didn't read what you quoted.

That's precisely what I *did* do!

It's a shame that you're not big enough to accept that what you suggested is
a damn silly idea - rather than continuing to try to defend the
indefensible! I haven't noticed anyone else agreeing with you - not even Dr
Drivel. g
--
Cheers,
Set Square
______
Please reply to newsgroup. Reply address is invalid.