View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
John
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Christian McArdle" wrote in message
. net...
I think he knew that and that was his original plan - however as I
understand it, the sparky ( or he forgot to communicate properly to the
sparky?) has forgotten about the oven and put it on the RCD side of the
circuit - he want to know if people have had problems with the oven on
the
RCD side of the circuit - Our oven is on the RCD side and so far we've
not
had any problems


Ah. I thought the original plan was to put a ring on the non-RCD side and
the sparky only put the oven on the RCD side because he thought the 20A
radial wasn't man enough, even though actually it is.

Christian.


Reading my own post again, I suppose it does sound confusing - sorry )

I never wanted a radial circuit in the first place, but rather two rings -
one RCD protected and one not, the UNprotected ring to take the oven,
fridge, freezer and boiler. Sparky made mistake and ran a 2.5 from
CUboilerfridgefreezer and ended it there, forgetting about oven and then
back to CU.

So, oven is now on protected ring and I'm wondering if I'm going to get lots
of nuisance tripping or some other problem because of that. The house is
going to be let out so I don't want the tenants ringing every fart's end
saying that they can't use the oven.

Given the hassle it'll be to get him to put his mistake right, should I just
leave the oven on the protected circuit?

John.