View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Ian Stirling
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
On 24 Sep,
"Dave Liquorice" wrote:

On 23 Sep 2005 18:09:06 -0700,
wrote:

No doubt you can do it, after all the smallest possible loo is only
4" wide - just an open pipe end.


Fine for solids, most people can aim that well but liquids? Squat
toilets have a channel extending about 9" in front of the hole for
those with places for your feet each side.

After A good explosive curry and a few pints?


The simple solution is a wet room.
No need for a sink either, or toilet, so it could be quite small without
trouble.