Thread: No Subject
View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Owain
 
Posts: n/a
Default No Subject

User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y
Subject: converting single to triple socket
References: . com .com t
In-Reply-To: t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: (please include full headers)
X-Trace: 9006026010c0e44218ae908973c0908466c0634969729ab8d7 0cce0043346b91
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:54:41 +0100
Message-Id:
Lines: 10
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.d-i-y:567079

Christian McArdle wrote:
The B & Q version sounds like a more useful product.

If somewhat against the spirit of the legislation. The thing is still
capable of passing 3x13A and completely overloading the ring at a single
point, even if it can deal with the current internally.


And, of course, would contravene the regs if fitted on a spur.

Owain