You learn something every day.
Thanks once again, Bob and Dan.
I'll stick to running the motor as an RPC for the foreseeable future. If I
want to get into experimentation for its own sake, I might do that sometime,
but I won't plan on running the shop from the experiment.
Regards,
Adam Smith
Midland ON
"Robert Swinney" wrote in message
. ..
Asdan said, " Induction generators do not work well when not connected to
the power
grid. But they do work well if they are connected to the power grid."
And therein lies part of the problem. If you've got a mechanically driven
induction generator connected to the "grid" for excitation purposes and if
you mechanically drive it faster than slip speed you will, in fact,
generate AC. If this were done, you'd see your watt/hour meter running in
reverse compared to its usu. direction of rotation. This would indicate
power was being supplied to the grid rather than consumed from the grid.
In the more general case of a "line excited" induction generator there
would have to be some way of supplying excitation to the generator rather
than it being directly connected to the grid as is done in the motor's
case. Don't confuse RPC's with induction generators - they are quite
different animals.
Bob Swinney
wrote in message
oups.com...
Sorry, I misunderstood what you were thinking. If I were doing this, I
would not simply drive the generator with no electric feed lines.
So if you leave your RPC connected as is and change the pony motor to
a ten hp motor driving the RPC through a belt drive, it will work very
well. By leaving the RPC connected to electric power, you will not
have to generate that phase. You could probably get by with less than
a 10 hp motor.
About 25 years ago I made someone a three phase source using a 7.5 hp
three phase motor and a two hp single phase motor. It powered a
centerless sander that had a 5 hp three phase motor as I remember. It
worked well for some twenty years until the business was sold and the
sander was moved to a location with three phase power.
Dan
|