Cliff wrote:
[
All sorts of variations have been coming in

"How many members of the Bush administration does it take to change a
light bulb?
"Ten.

"1. One to deny that a light bulb needs to be changed;

"2. One to attack the patriotism of anyone who says the light bulb
needs to be changed;

"3. One to blame Clinton for burning out the light bulb;

"4. One to tell the nations of the world that they are either for
changing the light bulb or for eternal darkness;

"5. One to give a billion dollar no-bid contract to Halliburton for
the new light bulb;

"6. One to arrange a photograph of Bush, dressed as a janitor,
standing on a step ladder under the banner 'Bulb Accomplished';

"7. One administration insider to resign and in detail reveal how Bush
was literally 'in the dark' the whole time;

"8. One to viciously smear No. 7;

"9. One surrogate to campaign on TV and at rallies on how George Bush
has had a strong light-bulb-changing policy all along;

"10. And finally, one to confuse Americans about the difference
between screwing a light bulb and screwing the country."
]

The light at the end of the tunnel is an oncoming train.

Ooh, cliffy, did you think that up all by yourself?