In article ,
Harold and Susan Vordos wrote:

"DoN. Nichols" wrote in message
...
snip---
Cast iron, itself, is somewhat abrasive, even without the skin,
as are some aluminum alloys. So -- if you are cutting a lot of these
materials, the carbide insert tooling should do most of the job,
followed by a switch to a sharp HSS for the final finish pass -- if you
need a better finish than the carbide inserts are giving you.

That isn't a problem if you use the proper grade of carbide, which many
don't understand. Steel grades (C5-C6, etc.) behave exactly as you
described, and you're sure it's because the material is abrasive. Truth is,
it's not, but the formulation of carbide isn't proper for the conditions at
hand. . By using a C2 grade for both cast iron or aluminum, what appears
to be abrasion quickly comes to an end. Being from the "old school" of
carbide, I know to use Carboloy 883 on stainless, cast/ductile iron, and
aluminum.

Thanks -- this is useful information. Though I was really
talking about the abrasion on HSS tooling, where the hard skin on cast
iron or the sapphire layer on anodized aluminum would wear a groove in
the areas which were exposed regularly to the hard skin.

I've yet to find a situation where HSS would perform better than carbide
when machining iron. Please keep in mind I'm a strong supporting fan of
HSS--

I know that you are.

--but it, too, has limitations.

Indeed so. I keep it on hand, and use it for some purposes, and
carbide for others.

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---