On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:04:30 -0700, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 17:04:52 +0000, Gunner wrote:

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:15:32 -0500, "PabloRena --- AnalProbe"
wrote:


I think that this shows that "Gunner" apparently has a fascination with
maggots and feels the need to fold them into every single analogy that he
can think of to graphical detail the fate (in his mind) of Bin Laden.


Or it could be that Ive seen my fair share of very dead people who
have been left laying around for the flys to gather on.

Yes, not a pleasant way to begin a day. No doubt that has an everlasting
impression on one's outlook, at least it has for me. But we are men, not
slaves to our hormones. As such it is imcumbant upon us to rise above
emotional reaction and use considered action whenever possible.

Democrats did not cause ever ill to society.

By the same token, neither did George W. Bush, but you wouldn't know that from
listening to the current crop of Blind Bush Bashers. They seem to have this idea
that every little thing that they consider bad should be laid at the feet of
George W. Bush, even if it happened in the year 1000 B.C. :/

Clinton was not responsible
for invading Iraq. Put the blame where responsibility lies, not on a
convient villan.

Sounds good. Look at the current threads on this(and many other boards).

By constantly attacking "liberals" or "clinton" you
dilute your message and cause people to ignore your rants.

Ditto.

If you want your opinion to be considered then it has to be fairly applied.

Back atcha.