On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:45:47 +0100, Guido wrote:

The Watcher wrote:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:01:23 +0100, Guido wrote:


This guy is a hoot. His argument is that because Iraq had Chemical
Weapons 13 years prior to 2003. That is justification for send 1800+ of
your countries young men and women to their deaths.


This guy can speak for himself too. Apparently you can't keep up with current
events either. The 2 chemical weapons I was speaking about were not found prior
to 2003. Some people are too stupid to know when to keep their mouths shut.


When they were found is not that same as when they were produced. Heck
they are still digging up old poison gas canisters in Flanders from WW1.

Nobody is trying to claim Flanders HAS no chemical munitions, though, are they?
That would be considered a red herring.