"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:16:25 +0100, "RichardS" noaccess@invalid
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On 7 Jun 2004 17:53:55 -0700, (cisco kid)
wrote:

snip

It's relatively easy to measure input power and can also mean that
seemingly impressive specs can be written. The Precision Performance
Power Pro (or whatever they are called this week) routers from B&Q are
the epitome of this, with a 2000W input power (allegedly) but with a
performance equivalent to about half that at best.

There would need to be some standards for this, and probably to be
useful, a measurement method for each type of tool under standard
conditions - i.e. a cutter of a certain size on a router etc.

I don't see that happening any time soon, so in the meantime it's
necessary to be guided by manufacturer, price, and ideally trying out
the tool.



Suppose output torque would be a useful measure. Don't see it happening
ever, though... manufacturers will use whatever gives the highest number
for
the consumer to read. Suspect a 50% efficient 2000W tool would always
sell
better than an otherwise-identical 75% 1500W tool.

Exactly. The opportunities for the marketeers are there.

You have to say "free". "Free watts with this drill". Then they flock in.
Like the "free" mobile phone con. They cost in a phone replacement every
year. So, if you don't get a replacement every year they make a killing.
People think they get something for nothing when they ring up and ask for an
upgrade of phone. Also the "free" minutes con too. If you don't use them
then it becomes expensive.