On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:27:27 +0100, John Cartmell
wrote:

In article ,
Andy Hall wrote:
OK. So the implication of this is that you are willing to accept a
lower return on your investments.

The return would go up if we were allowed to use slaves. Are you advocating
that idea or do you accept certain limitations?

Of course there are limitations.


I am simply pointing out that the suggestion of squeezing company
profits in order to fund higher payroll has consequences for
investments that many people make to fund their retirement.



--

..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl