"John Rumm" wrote in message
...
Set Square wrote:

Indeed - and it was a perfectly good explanation without the need for
anyone
to pick holes in it to demonstrate how clever they are!

Yup, second that...

In fact I think Matt's post was more accurate than Drivel's attempt at
pedantry anyway ;-)

I didn't attempt anything, I just put him right. His clearly wasn't clear
at all. Now you know, because beforehand you never.