"Andy Hall" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:30:28 +0100, "IMM" wrote:


"Tony Bryer" wrote in message
...
In article , Imm wrote:

What a stupid thing to say. Could it be that no one has heard of
them?
If there are two similar priced and sized houses and one has no
hearting bills, which one do you think people will go for? Now think
hard about this and I hope you don't have brain ache in the process.

They will go for the one with central heating. Seriously. This was
reported at a BRE conference: building society 'valuers' are not the
most clued up people when it comes to heating and were marking down the
value of a house if it didn't have c.h. even though it didn't need it.

I am not about stupid estate agents. A developers has a mixed bag of
50-50
eco and non-eco on the same development for the same price and similar
spec.
Which ones are going to sell, well?


The non-eco ones to the majority of people.

Nonesene. Two homes that look the same, similar spec and price? But one
has virtually no heating bills. ********!! What naive world are you in.
The word "eco " sells.

snip drivel