Gummer wrote:

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:45:54 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote:


Gunner wrote:

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:37:44 -0700, "Hawke"
wrote:



Are you admitting you think Thomas is the token house ******?

Gunner


You can call him anything you want but it is blatently obvious that he's the
least competent member of the court. He only got the appointment because of
his race and his far right wing philosophy. He never got the job on account
of merit, it was purely political. What you want to call him is up to you
but it wouldn't be inappropriate to use your term though.

Hawke



Your bigoted, biased race hating opinion is noted. Another Leftwing
racist heard from...way to go to exposing yourself, Parakeet.

Nice try, Gummer. This guy "Hawke" is *trying* hard to
be a right-winger. His sentiment about Thomas getting
his appointment in large part because of his race is
shared across the political spectrum, obviously for
different reasons.

The fact is, Thomas is a very bad justice.


The opinion of a confirmed racist such as yourself,

No. No confirmation, Gummer. It's obvious what you're
attempting to do, and it won't work. Calling Clarence
Thomas a weak justice is not racist. He *is* a weak
justice.

Sorry, Gummer. That's just how it is.