anus detector on

Shall we move this to a newsgroup where it is on-topic?

Doug Miller wrote:
In article .com, wrote:

CW wrote:
...
And of course, if Billy the Twit had taken Bin Laden when he had the
opportunity, much may have been prevented.

You mean, like, when Clinton had him trapped along the Afghanistan-
Pakistan border and then declared that he didn't know where or care
where bin Laden was, and then went and invade Iraq instead of finishing
off bin Laden? Oh, wait a minute, that was Bush.

So, what do you mean?

Sounds like he's referring to the fact that Sudan offered bin Laden to the
United States -- TWICE -- and Clinton refused the offer each time.


Does he have any evidence to support that? Last I read, the 'offer'
was made by a person who had failed to deliver on a previous offer
though he did NOT refund the bribe. One wonders what he did with the
money we were paying him, perhaps he was donating it to AL Queda?

Didn't Bin Laden leave the Sudan for Afghanistan befor the US had
implicated him in the WTC bombing, and befor the embassy bombings
in East Africa had been executed meaning the US didn't have
evidence to charge him with a crime?

--

FF