On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 01:15:00 -0700, "Hawke"
wrote:


Roberts is also the least likely nominee to alter the original
intent of the Constitution that you'll get from Bush.

Translation: Roberts will rule in an ultra conservative way on every case he
is involved in, which is just what Bush wants.

First of all...sometimes a cigar is simply a cigar. He may well NOT be
a member, despite your spew.

Secondly...you and your ilk seem to forget the fact that the Left LOST
the last two presidential elections. The winning president gets to
pick the people he wants in various positions. No you, not Chuckly
Shurmer, not the DNC unless it was a Democrat who won.

So quit your bitching. You had your 40 yrs to **** things up..and did
it so well that the nation recoiled to the Right. Get used to the
fact you and yours are not in power. Find a 12 step program or
something. If you are unable to deal with the angst, the Hemlock
Society has very good instructions on how to deal with your pain.

Third..it will be nice to have an Originalist on SCOTUS for a change.
Given the leftist slant of SCOTUS, its about time someone was placed
there to provide some balance. Perhaps you fail to remember it was
the Liberal judges who recently voted for emminant domain being
allowed to take your house and your property to give to another
private party, just to name one massive chunk removed from the
Constitution.

Fourth, only from your view way out there on the extreme Left, is
Roberts an "ultra conservative". For the rest of us, he is Right
Moderate, and a nice guy.

Need a crying towel or something? "I feel your pain"

Gunner

Liberals - Cosmopolitan critics, men who are the friends
of every country save their own. Benjamin Disraeli