Richard the Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:16:59 -0700, Stuart Grey wrote:


Mr. Canoza;

You responded to a mindless commie troll. You must be punished. Hold
out your hand.
(Whack hand with a ruler).

Sincerly,
Stuart Grey.

Rudy Canoza wrote:


What makes the Federalist Society "ultra" conservative? Isn't that just
a swear word? Would that be a little like the "ultra-liberal" National
Lawyers Guild?

The federalist society believes in the written intent of the
constitution, and the seperation of powers that it commands.

Since communist believe in the all powerful central government, in their
view America, as envisioned by the founding fathers, is "ultra
conservative" and evil. Communist hate America, and constantly work to
pervert the constitution.


Problem is, the way I understand it, it's the neocons that have been
consistently raping the constitution - case in point, the iminent
domain fiasco

Justices Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer were the justices
that ruled for New London and against property rights.

Justices O'Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas ruled against it.

It was the liberals, not the conservatives, who ruled against your
property rights.

BTW, None of these are "neocons". Neocons, or neoconservatives, are
usually Jews, and sometimes Roman Catholics, who have changed from
liberals to conservatives. You might accuse Thomas as being a neocon, as
he is black and blacks are traditionally liberals.



- they can take your house away as they see fit, if
there's more money in it for them.

Also the rape of the search & seizure protections.

It's the neocons who embrace the nazi ideal of absolute government
control, and are the true enemies of the Constitution.

Thanks,
Rich

You're going to have to find another way to accuse the conservatives of
perverting the meaning of the constitution, unless you want to argue
that Ginsburg et al are really conservatives. :-)