On 25 Jul 2005 10:26:37 -0700, jim rozen wrote:
In article , Dave Hinz says...he showed the
weakess that was then the cause of AQ deciding to get more

Cole was not on US soil. Is your standard attacks on US soil, or
attacks anywhere?

ARGH!

Clinton didn't respond to the attacks while they were still elsewhere.
This made AQ more bold to attack us here. It's not complicated.

We *still* haven't responded to AQ for the cole, or for 9/11.

AQ isn't IN iraq. We're not doing *anything* to slow them down.

/blink
/blink
Um. You do know that we did this little military thing over in
Afghanistan, right?

Yes, we sure should have spanked somebody for the cole, for the
first WTC attack. But we didn't, because they were saudis. And the
saudis are our friends, right?

I've never pretended that they also don't want to kill us.