View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
RBM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Doug, I've seen that many times myself. There are certainly types of
fixtures that mount close to ceilings that produce a lot of heat and are
fire hazards, however I still believe that a lot of these ratings are more
for liability than safety
"Doug Miller" wrote in message
m...
In article , "RBM" rbm2(remove
wrote:
What would you *think* the answer to this question would be? Why do you

think the manufacturers bother to put ratings and warnings on things?

My personal opinion is that it has more to do with liability than safety.

[snip]
I'm sure a good portion of these ratings
is just to pass the liability on to you the installer or the consumer


Your personal opinion, however, is incorrect. It has everything to do with
safety. I've had the misfortune of needing to replace numerous light
fixtures
that previous homeowners used 100W bulbs in, despite the clear warnings
"Danger risk of fire use 60W max". The excessive heat of the 100W bulbs
has,
in every case, severely damaged the fixture wires, causing the insulation
to
harden, crack, and fall off.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.