"Age is relevant. If he'd said he was 22, then it would be possible he
was
still in the teenage stage of being oblivious during the first half of
the
1990s.

Get it now? "

Yes, I get it. At age 52, you haven't got a clue about geography or
history or you wouldn't have made the silly claim that the US owned the
borders of Iraq during Sadam's regime. Yet, somehow you think age is
relevant to every discussion. Is that because you never learned
anything other than what you personally lived through?