"JT" wrote in message
oups.com...
Hi all,

I think the time has come for our existing lumber retaining wall to be
replaced. We have gotten a few quotes from local landscaping companies
/ contractors, and right now it comes down to Cinder Block (layered
with stucco) vs. Allan Block. From the estimates we have, cinder block
is about $2500 cheaper than the allan block. Does any one have any
experience / expertise opinion on these materials?

(cinder bock estimate was about $10500, allan block estimate was about
$13000).

I appreciate your inputs!
JT


I am not an expert on this subject.

A few years back I did do a good bit of research on the subject. I used a
similar block (Lee Block) instead of CB or poured concrete. The major reason
that I chose the blocks was water seepage. I became convinced that you
can't stop or even properly channelize underground water over a long period
of time. The blocks allow the water to flow through.

IMO the blocks have a much more natural look than a CB wall or even stucco.
This improves even more as they age and you get some natural variation.

The 1" per course step back softens the height of the wall a bit

If you do a little research I think you will find that stucco may fail
quickly when hydrostatic pressure is present.

Colbyt