In article , "Doug Kanter" wrote:

"Doug Miller" wrote in message
m...
In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote in message
. com...
In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Doug Miller" wrote in message
y.com...
In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Doug Miller" wrote in message
digy.com...
In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

Well, why do YOU think your president waited? I think he *wanted*
those
weapons moved, assuming the existed to begin with. Any idiot
could've
told
him the mostly likely place they'd vanish to (Syria).

Why on earth would he have wanted them moved?

How the phuque should I know???

*You* said you think he wanted them moved -- seems to me you ought to
have
*some* inkling of why you think that.

I've heard a theory or two, but if I mentioned them, it would divert
this
discussion in yet another direction.

Whatever. Just one more instance of you spouting uninformed nonsense
with
nothing to back it up...

I'm curious about your opinion of the
police/drugs scenario I mentioned.

I'm curious about why you can't ever answer a direct question. You said
you
think the President wanted Iraq's WMDs moved. I asked you why you think
that;
you said "how should I know" and launched off on yet another tangent.
The
obvious conclusion is that you have opinions, but don't know why you
hold
them, and don't enjoy having that fact held up to the light.

I told you. I have absolutely no friggin' idea.

OK. So you think he wanted them moved. But you have no idea why.

What would be your reason for thinking that, then?

Obviously, you want to continue this conversation, so please give me the
courtesy of reading what I write, or I'll end it, OK?

I'd be happy if *you* would read what you write.

I base my opinion on the observation of behaviors.

You still haven't answered the question: why do you think that Bush wanted the
WMDs moved?

I gave you a perfectly
good analogy with the police/drugs example, which you refused to respond to.

I asked you a perfectly good direct question, which you refused to respond to.

[snip irrelevantia]

I'm mystified by your thinking, although I'll return to the idea that your
have complete faith in Bush, as if he were a deity.

I haven't expressed any opinions in these last few posts by which you could
gauge my thinking - I'm questioning *your* opinions. You expressed a pretty
silly one, which you can't justify - you don't seem to have any idea at all
why you hold it.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again.