On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 03:01:57 +0100, "Doctor Evil"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:58:24 GMT, T i m wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:50:46 +0100, Andy Hall
wrote:

Could you explain though please Andy?

Of course. Simple. Virtually everything that we do has some
environmental impact.

Indeed, and most of us (and I'm hoping to include you here Andy g)
try to do 'our bit' towards the bigger picture?

Absolutely. As do I - for example high efficiency codensing boiler,
long before it became mandatory.

My objection is over a) being compelled and b) being coerced by ill
thought out schemes done to maximise political effect rather than
doing positive and meaningful things.

To your Little Middle England mind, that means any law made by the Labour
party.

All parties do it. I didn't single out TB for special attention.



Absolutely. Lower taxation, less involvement
of government and less
collectivism. It demonstrably doesn't work.

Collectivism works.

Such as in the former Soviet Union, Maoist China,.... as examples?

Some animals are more equal than others......





People like Ken L are trying to give cities back to people, and clean them
up.

So what's his next ploy? Communal bathrooms?


And he is right. Ken L wants Londoners to benefit, not people in
Surrey who sue London as a doormat and regard it as a place to make money
from.


The way to do that would be to encourage people not to go into central
London at all for business purposes which was my original point.



--

..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl