"Gort" wrote in message
...
FDR wrote:
"Gort" wrote in message
...

FDR wrote:

"Jim Yanik" . wrote in message
. 83...


"FDR" wrote in
m:



"Jim Yanik" . wrote in message
0.86...


"FDR" wrote in
.com:



"Jim Yanik" . wrote in message
. 170.84...


"FDR" wrote in
news


"Jim Yanik" . wrote in message
0.170.86...


"Gonzo" wrote in
as.rr.com:



"PaPaPeng" wrote in message
news:qkarc1drgkl0fjus3i8878fi5sn3kgbc8 ...


On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 22:04:10 GMT, "Gonzo"
wrote:



Well be sure to stick our asses in the air and wait for the
next attack so we can get your permission to go after the
source next time.


The US was free from problems with Muslims since its founding
until 9-11.

Not true.
Bin Laden alone made several attacks on the US and US overseas
embassies and military well before 9-11. Remeember the FIRST WTC
bombing,when CLINTON
was President? Or the two Embassy bombings or the USS Cole
bombing?



A scan of the National Geographic back issues should give a
good idea good prevailing relationships that had existed
through time.

Oh,yeah,that's a -great- source for political data. (not!)




So what were the events that led to 9-11 that spawned the
current mess? Physically 9-11 did appear out of thin air.

No,it did not.Not considering the previous attacks,like
WTC-bombing #ONE.




But there
was a lot happening prior to that would cause a bunch of
technologically naive Arabs to learn enough to fly a plane and
crash them with deadly effect. You cannot defeat a billion of
angry muslims to prevent another attack. So you must work out
a political solution and neither going to war or building space
age defences is going to do it.

Going to war will turn Iraq to a democratic state,and already is
fostering democratic changes in other ME states.

But will it be a positive democratic state? If they elect an
asshole as their leader, then we are in just as bad a situation as
before. Eemocracy does not equal a positive result necssarily.
Hey, we have a Democracy here and look, it got us Bush as
President.

Thankfully.
Otherwise,we would have surrendered to Islamic fanaticism shortly
after Kerry was elected.And surrendered to the UN,too.

Instead we are just generating more Islamic fanaticism. Thanks
George!



--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net



We are not generating anything that was not already there.

I see, Islamic fanatics are born, not created. It's a feature, like
dark hair or blue eyes. Well, you taught me something I never knew.



--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net



No,if you read Memri.org, or other sources,you might know about how
mosques
teach radical Wahabbi Islam and spread hate of non-Islamics.
How those Arabic countries use anti-West hatred to distract their
people

from internal issues


Sounds like what we do; use war and hate to distract us from our
problems.



--
Jim Yanik

Would you tell us why you liberals do that, or is that part of the Vast
LeftWing Conspiracy, and you can't talk about it, other than to deny it?


It was a conservative that started this war.



Oh, I should have known you use the lie-beral's favorite dodge...BLAME
EVERYTHING ON THE OTHER GUY!

You're right. President Gore and President Kerry started this war.





--
If you find a posting or message from myself offensive,
inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know
how to ignore a posting,complain to me and I will demonstrate.