On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:02:46 -0500, B.B. u wrote:
In article ,
Dave Hinz wrote:

Remind me again of what the followup attack to the US after 9/11/01 is?

And why can't you Bush supporters stick with the context of the
conversation.

You claimed that the anti-terrorism efforts weren't working. My
statement above is in response to that concept.

I was talking about worldwide terrorism since Bush has
been in office. Gunner tried to steer the conversation towards the
previous forty years, (and personal insults) and now you try to steer it
towards terrorism in the US only.

You said it hadn't helped. I'm showing how it apparently has helped. I
didn't claim it has eliminated it everywhere, which seems to be your
measure of success or failure.

Why are you doing that--it does not
have any bearing on what I said, even if it does have a few words in
common.

Well, it does, but you're not reading what I'm writing.

However, if you really do like the goal posts in their new position
then explain to me how what we're doing these days guarantees there
won't be any attacks on the US in the future.

Bloody. ****ing. Hell. I never said that. In fact, I said the
opposite. You claimed it wasn't helping. I mentioned that we haven't
been attacked on US soil since 9/11/01, so maybe it _is_ helping. You
counter with "if you can't guarantee, 100%, then it's not helping"?
Wow.