View Single Post
  #66   Report Post  
Andrew Gabriel
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article t,
Chip writes:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 00:00:28 +0100,it is alleged that "Dave Plowman
(News)" spake thusly in uk.d-i-y:

In article t,
Chip wrote:
As to wiring scenarios permitted but dangerous, to name a few we have
ring circuits, which allow the connection of 20A rated cable to a 30
amp circuit protective device. I know in practice they have proved
remarkably resilient, but they still give me the creeps. 1x 16A radial
per room, using 2.5mm cable with a _full size earth_ (none of this
cutdown 1.5mm earth in a 2.5 cable), maybe 2x20 amp radials for the
kitchen (on 4mm cable) would make me happier:-)


So you don't understand the principles of final ring circuits?


Yes I understand the principle. I just don't *LIKE* the principle.


You don't seem to understand why the CPC size can be reduced.

And 6amp lighting circuits with type B breakers, so that the lights on
the stairs go out at random (quite frequent) intervals is odd too.


Why would lights go out at random on the stairs?


Because type B 6 amp breakers often trip whenever a lamp blows on the
circuit.


Still using mains filament lamps in 2005? It really is time to move on...

--
Andrew Gabriel