lgb wrote:
In article ,
says...
Sorry,

But current copyright law applies to ALL photographs, and to all other
copyright material, regardless of when produced.

I'm not disputing that. I just think that in cases like the one I
posted, that law is ridiculous.

And again I ask, aren't "ex post facto" laws unconstitutional?

I suggest you check into the difference between "ex post facto" and
"retroactive."

--

FF