"The Court in this decision reaffirmed the unconstitutionality of
taking one person's private property and transferring it to
another private party "

"There's no substantive difference between this case and
similar cases over the past 100+ years. Private parties
(railroad companies, water and power companies and 1000
others) are routinely the eventual beneficiaries of eminent
domain land takings -- even primary beneficiaries."

Well, then I guess it's not uncontitutional to take one person's
private property and then give it to another private party, as you
stated then is it?