On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:05:17 GMT, the opaque Tom Quackenbush
spake:

Mark & Juanita wrote:
snip
The decision for which, I will reiterate, was rendered by the *liberal*
block of the Supreme Court with the collusion of the "moderate" Sandra
O'Connor (moderate in this usage being defined as a liberal without the
brazos to declare themselves so).
snip

Can you elaborate on how O'Conner colluded with the "liberal" block
in the Kelo case?

Since -she- fielded the main dissention paper, it seems doubtful that
he would be able to. O'Connor, Thomas, Scalia, and Rehnquist were the
4 Conservative(+ Mod) dissenters. The Libs pulled this one themselves
and Souter is about to pay for it heavily. His land may be next. Is
this justice, or what?
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html

The nasty Kelo decision and opinions of the justices is he
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/23jun20051201/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04pdf/04-108.pdf
I'm surprised there haven't been any shootings yet.

- This product cruelly tested on defenseless furry animals -
--------------------------------------------------------
http://diversify.com Web App & Database Programming