View Single Post
  #51   Report Post  
Mark & Juanita
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:19:34 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:


"George" wrote in message
...

"Swingman" wrote in message
...
"George" wrote in message

If something has value for a hundred years, it ought to be taxed....

LOL .. the prevailing attitude of the tax spenders ... and the Supreme

Court
ruling last week on private use of imminent domain just reinforces the

fact
that instead of ownership, you're now basically just renting real
property
from the government entity that taxes it, and you just may get to keep
it,
or pass it on to your heirs, as long as someone else doesn't come up with

at
ruse to justify increasing the tax base with it.

This sucker is getting to where it ain't worth fighting for any longer
...


"Eminent domain." Starts with an "E," like enema....


I'd like to see this happen
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html


I love it! There should be no issue with this, right?

It is further interesting to note, that despite all of the rhetoric
about how the right, conservatives, and the current adminstration are only
in it for giant corporations and to advance the corporate agenda, look who
of the men in black robes voted *for* government siezure of private land
from individual citizens for the benefit of large corporations and who
voted against that siezure; writing some very strong language regarding the
absolute tyranny that this move represented. Think about that when the
next supreme court justice vacancy is being filled.





+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+