On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:53:52 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:12:10 GMT, TokaMundo
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:35:16 -0500, John Fields
Gave us:

Plus, you're just as full of **** about the "someone else's schematic"
as you are about all the rest of the crap you post.

You must be _really_ stupid if you think you're going to pull that one
off, but if you want to try, let's see the message ID of the post
you're referring to, OK?


Your original post, dip****. The title of the post. It says (from
sed for bounty hunter). Then, you again refer to the "OP" in another
post.

---
Had you bothered to get off of your fat, lazy ass and checked the
origin of the thread you might have discovered that it started on sed
where the OP asked for a five minute timer.

Since sed is a text-only newsgroup I advised the OP that I'd have a
solution for him which I'd post to abse, (where binaries are allowed
to be posted) then when I posted, I used the same subject as in sed in
order to keep some continuity, but indicated that the _thread_ came
from sed. Not the _post_, pinhead, the thread. The clue should have
been that since the post had a binary attached to it, it _couldn't_
have come from sed
---

Make up your mind. Is it yours or someone else's.

---
Maybe now that I've spelled it out for you you can figure it out.


339 posts so far (including this one) and zero content... just the
usual infantile squabbling.

John