On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:29:10 GMT, TokaMundo
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:42:48 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
Gave us:

And you are too damn stupid to recognize the component as a
oscillator module. The "U" designator is used this way by a lot of
manufacturers since it is not a crystal, and at the design level it is
just another chip.

PLONK!

If the retarded twit can critique someone else's spelling, he can
handle being called on not designating the crystal (and yes it's a
crystal) correctly.

---
Oh, my, the little ****'s got her knickers in a bunch for being pegged
as too ****ing stupid to know a crystal from a crystal oscillator and
now she's going to be insufferably rude until she gets over her fit of
pique!

No, you stupid ****, it _isn't_ a crystal, it's a crystal
_oscillator_.

If it was a crystal it would look something like this:


+--------------------
|
|
| OSC IN OSC OUT
+---+----------+-----
| |
+---[R1]---+
| |
| [R2]
| |
+---[Y1]---+
| |
[C1] [C2]
| |
GND GND

Where Y1 would be the crystal, as I explained in an earlier post.

But you don't want to hear about that, do you? No, you'd rather yell
and scream and stamp your little feet over nothing.

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer