On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:39:22 -0700, Kitchen Man
wrote:

On 10 Jun 2005 23:06:10 -0700, wrote:

You actually proved my
point that DC is DEFINED (i.e. by convention) as "zero frequency".
Is it that weird to posit that the superior concept with respect to
considering any signal as AC or DC, be the actual NET current flow? I
could see your point if signals were classified as either "ZF" ("zero
frequency") or "NZF" (non-zero frequency") but we are dealing with "DC"
or "AC"

If nothing else, your stubborn adherence to a flawed terminology and
lack of openness to furthering your understanding will make you look
like an idiot in a job interview, should you ever decide to pursue
career advancement in the electronics industry. Please note that I am
not saying you are an idiot, just that you will look like one in an
interview. The interviewers will assume you know very little about
the basics of the craft if you carry on like this, or at the very
least will see you as a detriment to teamwork. HTH.

---
His attitude, if he persists with it, will be a serious detriment no
matter what field of endeavor he chooses to enter.

Starting to see it my way, Al?-)

--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer